How it works
Book → appetite → mechanism → proof.
Genre is too blunt. We care about what the story was doing when you loved it.
Recognition
We make a specific claim about what you rewarded.
Correction
If we are wrong, say so. We would rather stop than force a fit.
Proof
Every published comparison must terminate in actual CWADM material.
Recognition is not persuasion.
We separately record whether our read of your appetite felt accurate and whether the eventual argument actually moved you. A comparison can understand you correctly and still fail to earn the recommendation.