If you liked
The Way of Kings
You liked The Way of Kings. Fine. That tells us almost nothing.
We are going to recommend CWADM. First we have to earn a reason.
Wrong room?
Our biasWe already know the destination.
Your protectionYou can reject the premise before we make the pitch.
Start narrower
What did you actually love?
Only one of these currently has a CWADM bridge we are willing to defend publicly. The others are useful corrections, not bait.
Fair correction
We’re not going to force that comparison.
Those are real reasons to love the book. We simply haven’t earned a public CWADM comparison for them yet.
Good answer
Then our read missed.
That is more useful than a false match. Try another book, or let us choose another published argument at random.
Our read
Recognition matters more than agreement. Tell us if this is actually why the book worked on you.
Fair. Correct us.
Then we stop here.
We would rather lose the recommendation than invent a reason you should like it.
What we think you rewarded
Why we think CWADM rhymes with it
Where the comparison stops
Actual proof
The Reading Edition is still being prepared. This chapter is the proof target, but the prose is not publicly open yet.
See the Reading RoomDid the argument move you?
Recorded for this visit. No account required.